Skip to main content

Performance Tuning With AI

5 min read
BackendApi DevGeneral Swe

Backend

AI finds hot spots. You decide what's worth fixing and what the business trade-off is.

Api Dev

Latency budgets, caching strategy, and rate limits are product decisions. AI implements; you design.

Performance Tuning With AI

TL;DR

  • AI can analyze profiles, suggest indexes, and propose query optimizations. It's good at pattern matching.
  • Interpretation and prioritization are yours. Not every bottleneck is worth fixing. Some "fixes" have side effects.
  • Use AI to surface issues. You decide: fix it, defer it, or accept it.

Performance work used to be manual: read the flame graph, trace the slow query, add an index, measure again. AI can now suggest optimizations from profiles and query plans. That speeds things up. It also means you need to filter—AI will suggest changes that are wrong, risky, or not worth the cost. Your job is to decide.

What AI Can Do

  • Profile analysis. Point AI at a flame graph or trace. It identifies hot paths, suspicious allocations.
  • Query optimization. "Add index on X." "Rewrite this as a join." SQL and NoSQL both—AI has seen many patterns.
  • Code-level suggestions. "Use a connection pool." "Batch these requests." "Cache this result."
  • Bottleneck detection. From logs or metrics, AI can hypothesize: "Looks like N+1," "Possible memory leak."

What AI Gets Wrong

  • Over-optimization. Fixing a 0.1% hotspot when the real problem is elsewhere. AI doesn't know your priorities.
  • Dangerous suggestions. "Drop this index"—maybe it's used elsewhere. "Disable this check"—maybe it's there for a reason.
  • Missing context. Your DB runs on different hardware. Your traffic pattern is spiky. AI suggests in a vacuum.
  • Trade-off blindness. Caching improves latency but adds consistency risk. AI might not flag it.
  • Premature optimization. AI suggests micro-optimizations before you've confirmed the bottleneck matters.

The Workflow That Works

  1. Measure first. Profiling, tracing, query analysis. Get data.
  2. Ask AI to interpret. "Here's my flame graph. What do you see?" Use it as a second pair of eyes.
  3. Prioritize yourself. What's the biggest impact? What's the risk? What's the cost?
  4. Implement and verify. AI suggests; you code. Measure again. Did it help?
  5. Document trade-offs. "We added this index for read performance; writes are 5% slower. Acceptable for our workload."

What You Must Own

  • Establishing baselines. What's "fast enough" for your product? AI doesn't know.
  • Setting performance budgets. P95 latency, error rate, throughput. Business decisions.
  • Evaluating risk. Will this change break something? AI doesn't have full context.
  • Explaining to stakeholders. "We can fix X but it means Y." That's communication, not code.

Read flame graph. Trace slow query manually. Hypothesize. Add index. Measure. Repeat. Hours of detective work.

Click "Performance Tuning With AI" to see the difference →

Quick Check

AI suggested dropping an index to improve write performance. What do you do?

Do This Next

  1. Run a profile on one service or endpoint. Feed the output to AI. Compare its suggestions to what you'd do. Note the gaps—that's your "AI performance review" filter.
  2. Document one performance decision you made: what you measured, what you tried, what you chose, and why. That narrative is the work AI can't produce.