Skip to main content

Why Embedded Engineers Are Safe

5 min read
Embedded

Embedded

Your moat: hardware, timing, safety, and domains where 'move fast and break things' isn't an option.

Why Embedded Engineers Are Safe

TL;DR

  • Embedded work is hardware-adjacent, timing-sensitive, and often safety-critical. AI struggles in all three.
  • Your moat: you know the hardware, you understand certification, and you operate in domains where failure has consequences.
  • The embedded engineers at risk are the ones doing generic CRUD on a Raspberry Pi. The ones doing real embedded—MCUs, safety, hardware—are in a strong position.

"AI will replace programmers" gets a lot of airplay. Most of that airplay is about web and app development. Embedded is different. Here's why.

Moat #1: Hardware Intimacy

AI has seen millions of lines of firmware. It hasn't held your board, read your schematic, or debugged a race condition that only happens when the power supply droops. Hardware is physical. Datasheets are long and product-specific. Errata, workarounds, and "we discovered this at 3am" knowledge—that's human.

Your value: you bridge software and hardware. You know what the silicon actually does.

Moat #2: Timing and Real-Time

Embedded systems have deadlines. Servo loop: 1ms. Safety monitor: 100µs. AI can suggest code. It can't guarantee it meets the timing. You profile, you tune, you verify. Worst-case execution time, interrupt latency, jitter—these require measurement and judgment. AI doesn't run oscilloscopes.

Your value: you own real-time behavior. That's not automatable with current AI.

Moat #3: Safety and Certification

As covered in the previous lesson: safety-critical domains require traceability and human accountability. AI-generated code is a compliance headache. The trend is caution, not adoption. Your certification expertise (DO-178, ISO 26262, etc.) is scarce. AI can't replace the person who signs the affidavit.

Your value: you're the one who can get the system certified.

Moat #4: Domain Specificity

Embedded spans: automotive, medical, industrial, aerospace, consumer. Each has its own standards, vendors, and quirks. AI trains on "average" embedded. Your domain—e.g., motor control for EVs, or infusion pump firmware—has nuances AI hasn't seen. The less generic the domain, the safer you are.

Your value: deep domain knowledge. AI assists; you own the domain.

Who Is at Risk?

Embedded-adjacent work that looks like generic software:

  • Simple scripts on Raspberry Pi. AI can do that.
  • High-level application logic on embedded Linux. Closer to web dev; more automatable.
  • Repetitive driver work for well-documented, common peripherals. AI might get 80% there.

The engineers doing "real" embedded—bare metal, real-time, safety, weird hardware—are in a strong position. The work is hard to automate. The stakes are high. The talent pool is small.

How to Strengthen Your Position

  1. Lean into safety and certification. Get trained. Own the process. That's a moat.
  2. Master your hardware. Know the errata. Know the workarounds. Write them down. AI doesn't have your notes.
  3. Stay hands-on. Debug with a scope. Measure. The engineers who can touch hardware are harder to replace.
  4. Use AI for non-critical acceleration. Docs, boilerplate, test ideas. Save your brain for the hard parts.

Manual process. Repetitive tasks. Limited scale.

Click "With AI" to see the difference →

Quick Check

What remains human when AI automates more of this role?

Do This Next

  1. List your "hardware intimacy" knowledge: boards you've brought up, errata you've worked around, timing you've verified. That's your moat. Document it.
  2. If you're in a safety domain, get explicit on certification. If you're in a non-safety domain, consider whether adding safety/certification skills would strengthen your position.